Long To Reign Over Us

It’s not often I’ll agree with Iain Martin, but this is one of those times. I loved watching Nicola Sturgeon singing God Save the Queen for a few reasons – and they aren’t reasons Unionists are going to like.

For one, it will please the majority of Scots who actually like the Queen, and want to retain her in an independent Scotland – as the SNP proposed in the White Paper. For another, the fact she did not gie it laldy and belt it out has strained outraged monarchists to boiling point – not to mention the people who viewed the Queen spending this auspicious day with Nicola Sturgeon as a poor use of her time:

And, of course, there’s also the people who believed it showed a profound humiliation of the apparently hypocritical Sturgeon:

Meanwhile, the Daily Mail gleefully published what they perceived to be total outrage from their great white whale, the Vile Cybernats.

Now STURGEON is trolled by the cybernats: Angry nationalists slam Scotland’s First Minister for welcoming the ‘foreign Queen’

Well, I can imagine a lot of independence supporters who are not in the SNP would feel that way. RIC, the SSP, and the Scottish Greens are all republican, as are newcomers RISE, and support removing the queen as head of state. And even though the SNP proposed to keep the monarchy in the White Paper, the great influx of new SNP supporters almost certainly has more than a few republicans among them. I should know, I am one. So what sort of slamming did the First Minister receive from these “nationalists”?

It’s natural the Mail will presume “foreign Monarch” is in reference to Elizabeth being Queen of England, rather than her Saxe-Coburg and Gotha ancestry, and the “wrong title” could be part of the “Queen Elizabeth II” controversy. Nonetheless, Mr Duff has posted many tweets in support of SNP, though I can find no evidence that he is an SNP member. I welcome him to get in touch to clarify.

Now this one is very interesting, as Joe Byrd does not exactly strike me as an SNP member going by his other tweets:

The Mail even makes special mention of Mr Byrd:

However, the SNP leader was criticised by Scottish nationalists who accused her of ‘worshipping an Anglo-German Queen’.

Now, can anyone tell me why the Daily Mail would call a person who has called the SNP “illegitimate,” “dangerous,” intolerent, racist, even the evergreen “tartan Tories” a Scottish nationalist? I’m sure the Mail’s Deputy Political Editor Tom McTague simply missed all these tweets from the person they call one of the “aggressive nationalists” when they were rigorously checking the background of the people they cite in their article. Easy mistake to make, I suppose.

As “slamming” goes, this is rather genteel. While I haven’t found anything much on Ms Whitten’s timeline in regards to her politics (as is her right), it is notable that I couldn’t find a single direct mention of the SNP, nor any other tweet regarding the First Minister aside from the above, and a style tip:

Thus, while Ms Whitten could well be an independence supporter, an SNP voter and even member, she is a pretty bad cybernat – though it’s pretty safe to say she’s a republican.

Finally, we have someone who openly admits their status as an SNP member and supporter, whose timeline is positively choc-a-bloc with pro-SNP tweets… and the only example of “abuse” the Mail puts is a completely and utterly harmless hope to celebrate an “Independence Day” in Scotland every year. That’s it. That’s the Daily Mail’s entire catalogue of “barrage of criticism” from “angry Scottish nationalists”:

    • one identified SNP member,
  • one identified SNP voter,
  • one that may or may not support independence and/or the SNP,
  • and one who’s actually anti-SNP.

Top work, Mr McTague. Well done. But let’s be fair – the Mail also chose to publicise one tweet from someone who accused the First Minister of hijacking the Queen’s visit:

I’m sure the reason they didn’t post some other tweets which include the words “Sturgeon” and “Queen” (which I won’t link to, but I’m sure you can find them if you have a strong stomach for certain words) was to preserve the sensibilities of delicate Mail readers while they work themselves into a froth over those dreadful migrants and beastly foreigners.

Yet it wasn’t just the Mail which blamed independence supporters for comments from people who almost certainly are not: Mark Piggot of the International Business Times did it too:

For her part, the Queen also thanked the many well-wishers who have sent messages. However a number of people – thought to be so-called “Cybernats”, ferociously keen on independence – condemned Sturgeon for “worshiping [sic] an Anglo German Queen.”

One tweeted: “How brilliant to see the wonderful words of praise about HM Queen & the monarchy coming from the mouth of the wee Scottish hypocrite Sturgeon.” Another commented: “Looking forward to having an ‘Independence Day’ to celebrate every year.”

The first and third were already covered above. That second one is from @WelshToy, or “Undercover Toy.” Here are some other tweets:

Sound like a nat to you?

Yes, it was tough for me, watching the leader of Scotland’s government paying homage to someone who is emblematic of the toxic Westminster establishment I campaigned so strongly to escape last year. I don’t know if the First Minister truly found it tough or not: I’m sure she’s had it much tougher, particularly when she swore an oath to the queen upon becoming First Minister to begin with.

I’m sure the socialists and republicans among the Yes movement would’ve loved Nicola to refrain from singing along to an anthem which contains “rebellious Scots to crush.” It would’ve given us a great kick to see her pull a Rosie Kane. But not now. Let the babies have their bottle. Let them think that this is a humiliating PR defeat for the First Minister, that the Cybernats have turned against her, that she is beaten. Let them enjoy their crass delight in seeing a foe brought low, as they wave their flags and belt their anthems with impunity while denouncing the waving of Scotland’s flag and singing of Scotland’s anthems as racist, anti-English, xenophobic, parochial and small-minded.

Meanwhile, 53% in one poll. 55% in another. And there are five others.

Tick.

Tock.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Long To Reign Over Us

  1. Jacob Benjamin says:

    For the unionists, the monarchy is just a feeble, yet furiously brandished, tool in their armamentarium. It leaves them hopelessly wrong footed to have to deal with the reality that Independence has nothing to do with the Monarchy, in truth! They hate it when this scrappy piece of rug they stand on is pulled from under their blessed feet.

  2. J. R. Tomlin says:

    It was a simple matter of courtesy, moreover, as you more or less pointed out, it is extremely doubtful that Sturgeon is a republican. Of course, her private feelings could be different from the SNP position. Much of what you see is the Anglocentric assumption by unionists that the Queen is Queen of England and could not be Queen of a separate Scotland. Needless to say, that would be a shock to the many nations she still is titular queen of such as Canada and Australia.

  3. I never liked that Jhonnie Rotten & GSQeenie .Diz that make me a royalist,( naw just sombody who likes GOOD music)

  4. macart763 says:

    Heh, the Mail and the other dailies in the metro set are doing a grand job of destroying their union all by themselves. 🙂

    I doubt they’ve even connected the dots yet as to why the independence movement went from sub 30% to 45% in two years and have since the referendum gained a further 8 points. They’re probably still in the dark over the SNPs landslide achievement in May and frankly long may they remain clueless.

    The more anti Scottish resentment and naked racism they use, the more they alienate the Scottish electorate. The more Westminster’s establishment parties and media disrespect and disregard Scotland’s representatives the more apparent becomes the true nature of the political union. Finally, the farther we get from September 18th, 2014 with absolutely zero delivery of any of the perceived promises made or enacted, the more fraudulent, farcical and unsustainable both the result and the position of BT/HMG becomes.

    Cap that lot with the punitive austerity measures and the greed obsessed, corporately compromised, elitist ideology of Conservative government and nature will take its own course.

    It was all there for them on a plate. The referendum won, all they had to do was apply carrot rather than stick, but the establishment’s true nature will out as always.

  5. […] September: Long To Reign Over Us – A wee bit of Wings Over Scotland-inspired media analysis, where someone who called the SNP […]

What're your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s