For As Long As A Hundred Of Us Remain Alive

Yes InverclydeYou can’t put out all our candles.

If I had any regrets throughout this campaign, it’s that I was too openly optimistic. I do not regret believing that Yes would win, not for a single second – any second spent worrying about a No vote was a second wasted in misery and despair. So I put it out of my mind. But I do regret that I thought everybody had this exact same mindset. I truly believed that once galvanised with the belief in independence, every single Yes voters would be like me, and all the people I’ve come to truly love at Yes Inverclyde. I truly believed that it would be a Yes vote, because I couldn’t understand anyone who came into the shop not being willing to stand on their feet for close on 20 hours. I shouldn’t have simply trusted in that. At the end of the day, we needed boots on the ground. We simply didn’t have enough of them – if we had even a hundred of us at Yes Inverclyde, we could’ve soared.

I’m so sorry to all who’ve lost hope. But all I have to say is to look to Inverclyde. We are 1.5% of Scotland, which is amazingly close to the 1% Scotland is compared to the European Union – makes you feel a bit like Scotland in miniature. In our area, the 16-29 year old demographic is 16.6% of our population – 18.3% is the average for Scotland. The significance of this is a smaller amount of potential young voters who seem to have been more likely to vote Yes – and the Lord Ashdown post-referendum poll bears that out. Sadly, at the other end of the scale, the 60+ demographic are 25.6% of our population, while the rest of Scotland’s is 23.7% – and again, the Lord Ashdown post-referendum poll shows that the 60+ are much more likely to vote No. You’re looking at almost 5% of the vote. Or, in real terms, there are 20,000 60+ voters within the Inverclyde electorate, but we are lacking 3,000 16-29 within the electorate. So, we have about 2,000 extra older people compared to the Scottish average.

With these demographics, we were predicted to get 20% Yes. We have a higher than average elderly population, and lower than average young population. We were all told we weren’t going to take Inverclyde – we just had to do the best we could, get as many Yes voters as we could for the overall count. We’d have to steel ourselves with the reality that we’d lose the battle, but hope to win the war.

Final results? It was so close only 86 people decided the count. Out of 54,572, we got 27,243 – statistically a dead heat, to the point where we needed two recounts. Far from the “resounding” victory our soon-to-be-ex MPs and MSPs assert, Inverclyde’s No majority was a wafer-thin 0.2%. If we canvassed Kilmacolm and Quarriers’ Village (which were not included in our region, it was given to Renfrew – for some reason canvassing was done by Holyrood regions but the polling by Westminster, or maybe the reverse, I still haven’t slept much), I can practically guarantee Yes would’ve taken a substantial proportion of the No votes they returned. If you consider only the areas Yes Inverclyde did canvass, then Yes Inverclyde did win.

Yes Inverclyde tanned No’s hide, bloodied its nose, blackened its eyes, rattled its bones, fought to the absolute finish. We went the 15 rounds.  They came into this fight expecting to crush us, to sail to a comfortable 70% or 80%. They had the might of Westminster, every single daily newspaper in Scotland (including the Greenock Telegraph despite its protestations of “impartiality”), the entire British media, the wealth of billionaires, a campaign of despicable lies, and the substantial support of the Orange Order on their side. We had about 20 regular campaigners and another 30 grassroots, and a wee shop on Cathcart Street for the last few months. When all was said and done, Inverclyde went from a “2 out of 10” in expectations for a Yes vote, into the 6th best percentage for the whole of Scotland. They could only scrape by with a mere 86 votes out of 54,572. 0.16%.

My heart goes out to all who’ve lost hope, whose candle of hope has been snuffed out, but mine hasn’t. Nor has the hope of any of my friends at Yes Inverclyde. But we’re not going to win based on the good intentions of sympathetic Yes voters, or moral support from outside observers. That is the lesson of the referendum for me, a variation on something Elbert Hubbard once said: “Those who say it cannot be done should stop interrupting those who are getting it done.” Far too many were interrupting us, and not nearly enough of us were getting it done. Let us learn from this lesson.

“As long as a hundred of us remain alive…”

There are a hell of a lot more than a hundred of us yet.


13 thoughts on “For As Long As A Hundred Of Us Remain Alive

  1. I believed ,, still do ,,,great campaign ,,so many of us ,,it can only get bigger , YYYEESSSS FOR LIFE .

    • alharron says:

      That’s the key: that 45%? That’s not going to shrink. It can *only* grow. Nobody who voted Yes in this referendum would suddenly change their minds if another one was held in a year’s time. Can the No vote say the same, especially after George Square and the broken vow?

  2. Janwalker says:

    Yes I’m sure there are many including myself who could have done more, but are beginning to feel energized after defeat. I along with my family members will do more including joining the SNP or Greens as a starting point. I think this defeat at the polls is having a very strange effect on us all, and slowly as our souls heal we are talking and reaching out for more, and will not settle.

    • alharron says:

      I don’t think there’s a single Yes voter, campaigner or organiser who isn’t looking back, feeling *I could have done more.* I sure feel that. I wish I never abandoned my interest in politics during college, and came to the cause sooner. But I’m not going back in the box.

      Westminster were banking on a No vote shutting us all up – if anything, the 45 are more determined than ever. They thought if they could get rid of Alex Salmond, the SNP would collapse – but we’re seeing thousands of new members signing up in the last 36 hours. They thought we’d be too soul-destroyed to notice that they broke their Vow mere hours after the votes were counted – just look at Twitter.

      I’ve often stated my resolution in being strictly non-party, because I’ve seen the nonsense that happens with party tribalism. But it’s become clear to me now that party politics does not *necessarily* result in such tribalism – it’s only Westminster parties that do. The SNP, Greens and SSP have been exemplary in their working with each other – Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrats are tearing each other apart.

      So I’ve decided I have to pin my name to a mast. That mast is the SNP. My mum, gran, and grandad have done the same. I encourage everyone to do the same – if not the SNP, then the Greens or SSP, ANY of the parties which have acted impeccably throughout the campaign. Labour must be destroyed. The vestiges of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats must also be destroyed. It’s time for the new politics, where we can campaign for SNP, Greens and SSP together in collaborative, not competitive, party politics.

  3. Radweesis says:

    We’re going to need a bigger shop next time, Al!

  4. ronnie cowan says:

    Thanks Al. 🙂

    • alharron says:

      Thank YOU, Ronnie.

      Ronnie Cowan, for those not in the know, is the leader of Yes Inverclyde – our leader. And I am no calling you that in a wry, self-deprecating, tongue-in-cheek kind of way – I mean in it in all sincerity and respect. If anyone’s earned that authority, Ronnie Cowan has.

  5. Tony Watson says:

    Wish i had got off my backside sooner and engaged in the YES campaign earlier. Last week prior to polling day i went into the shop to volunteer my services. Went out leafleting , Ashton road , st johns road , Midton areas of Gourock, and Mid Auchinleck and Bardrainney and Port Glasgow town centre. Done a couple of hours handing out leaflets outside the oak mall.On polling day got up at 5:30 am to leaflet at 6am in the Burnhead street, Corlic street and Killie road area, then back of 8am to stand outside the polling station(Auchmountain halls) beside the no campaigner, Stood chatting to him and had a good laugh throughout the day, guy was sound as a pound . Didnt realise he was one of my local councillors let alone the current provost. Done my own exit poll handing out YES polling day cards as momentos/keepsakes after people had just voted, if they refused they went down as a no, had handed out over 350 cards or so by 2 pm and i had more taking them than i had refusals, so i was quite optimistic that we would win, alas wasnt to be. IF i was to ever get engaged again i would only be willing to leaflet /canvass my own sorrounding area rather than canvas wards miles away from where i live

  6. Hugh Wallace says:

    Reblogged this on Are We Really Better Together? and commented:
    “Those who say it cannot be done should stop interrupting those who are getting it done.”

  7. Hugh Wallace says:

    Al, are you on Facebook? It would be great to connect with you there. Hugh

  8. […] at 2.4% – 6.7%, and the NeoLibDems at 0.7% – 3.5%. Imagine a 49.9% SNP result, what a sweet irony. That tiny overlap of a mere 1.8% between the two frontrunners is what’s bothering me: far […]

What're your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.