No More Lies

Your metal soundtrack for the post is provided by Iron Maiden

To anyone who’s only just becoming involved in the campaign for Scottish Independence, it can be extremely difficult for longtime campaigners, or even folk like me (I only really started campaigning properly about the time the referendum was announced), to elucidate to complete newcomers exactly what it’s all about. There’s just so much to say! Democracy, accountability, equality, social justice, environmentalism, identity, anything and everything. It’s particularly difficult when undecideds bring up the “big issues” as dictated to them by the UK establishment: what currency will we use? What about our pensions? What about jobs? All things you’ll read in Better Together literature.


So I got this through the door yesterday. Crumpled, bashed, rudely handled, I dared to imagine the courier: an angry youth? An impatient jobseeker? A Liverpudlian bussed up courtesy of Anas Sarwar? Whoever it was, they didn’t seem to care if it got battered about.*

As with Alistair Darling’s visit, it’s one thing for you to see this on the television or the internet, even out on posters and billboards on the road to Glasgow. But to have this in your home, intruding on your personal space… Well, how best to explain to people who have no idea of anything about the referendum exactly why my immediate reaction was to wonder what the most insulting origami creature I could make from the leaflet? Their nonsense has been discredited hundreds of times by now, by the indefatigable Wings Over Scotland, NewsNet Scotland, Bella Caledonia, National Collective, Craig Murray, Derek Bateman, Paul Kavanagh… really, too many to list. Then I thought: this leaflet may well encapsulate everything wrong about Better Together for me. To my utter amazement, I believe a case could be made that every single statement in this leaflet is wrong. But it more than just wrong, as in inaccurate or in error – it is a lie. It is deliberate. It is concerted.

I know, I know, how could that possibly be true? Even the most fraudulent of politicians have some sort of basis in truth, don’t they? Surely the entire Better Together campaign has something going for it, some genuine points in favour of the Union? It seems completely irrational that the side which is still currently ahead in most polls is so tenuously gossamer-thin. Yet as far as I’m concerned, it is.

So I’ve decided all I can do now, after years of explaining, is to be perfectly and utterly blunt. I will go through this leaflet, and explain why everything in it is not only incorrect, but dishonest, and be as concise and uncompromising as possible.



THIS IS A LIE. How can we possibly know whether our public services would be better or worse outside of the United Kingdom when it hasn’t happened yet? As things stand now, UK public services are being slashed mercilessly by the UK government, and unlike many government decisions, this cannot simply be reversed by a new regime.


THIS IS A LIE. Scotland has higher public spending than the UK average – not “the rest of the UK,” as the public spending in Northern Ireland is much higher per head. But even excepting Northern Ireland, the higher proportion of public spending is more than offset by the higher proportion of taxes raised in Scotland – £1,700 higher per head. Taking the higher spending out of context with the higher taxes presents a completely fallacious impression of the real situation. (Also the coin piles are not reflective of the stats: it should look like 11 coins against 13 (15% difference), not 14 against 20 (30% difference))


THIS IS A LIE. “Experts” implies a consensus, as if every expert in the world is in agreement – which is obviously not the case. Several notable NHS workers, doctors, nurses and experts are explicitly in favour of independence, while Teachers for Yes boasts 500 members so far. I’d much rather trust the word of those in the education and health professions than the unsourced, unnamed “experts” here.


THIS IS A LIE. There is no UK NHS: there have been entirely separate and independent National Health Services for Scotland and England and Wales since their foundations in the 1940s. Groups from Great Ormond Street Hospital to NHS Blood & Transplant have stated unequivocally that there would be no changes to the current situation in the event of independence. Either Dr Bowie is mistaken, or GOSH and NHSBT are.


THIS IS A LIE. Scottish Universities benefit massively from the extra funding from the Research Councils UK because they are good, not because they are in the UK. RCUK is explicit: “Research Council funds are awarded on the basis of applications made by individual researchers, which are subject to independent, expert peer review. Awards are made on the basis of the research potential and are irrespective of geographical location.” Cameron is not technically incorrect in that Scotland receives funding “as part of the UK,” but the impression is that the funding is given because it is part of the UK.


THIS IS A LIE. The “drop” in Scottish oil revenue was a result of major investment stalling productivity, not due to some mysterious “volatility.” The money wasn’t lost, it was spent – specifically, spent in order to invest in future discoveries. And, of course, it ignores that Scottish oil and gas accounts for only 15% of Scotland’s economy – Norway’s is 20%. They’re doing fine.


THIS IS A LIE. If being part of a bigger country did mean more economic opportunities, then why are most of the richest countries in the world smallsome even smaller than Scotland? If size protected us from economic crises, then why were the USA and Russia harder hit than Hong Kong or Singapore?


THIS IS A LIE. As if I have to tell you why it takes a brass neck to say your money’s safe in the UK.


THIS IS A LIE. Without any citations or names, these “economists” could be entirely made up for all we know. We do know, however, that plenty of businesses like those of Business for Scotland and Wealthy Nation evidently disagree.


THIS IS A LIE. Craig’s job does not depend on being part of the UK at all: the MoD and BAE have already made clear that Royal Navy contracts will remain for the Prince of Wales aircraft carrier, and BAE systems have no plans to halt production in the event of a Yes vote. Yet even if that were so, why should production dry up simply because the UK doesn’t put in orders? Scotland will need ships of her own. It is a cruel irony that a shipbuilding industry that was once the pride of the world has been so devastated that the loss of 72 jobs at Ferguson is a deathly blow – and even more ironic that we’re to expect the UK will protect those jobs where it failed to protect hundreds of thousands before it.


THIS IS A LIE. As stated above, that £1,200 is more than offset by the £1,700 raised in taxes. What’s more, that extra spending is not just spent on schools and hospitals, but interest on the UK’s debt, as well as what used to be called “imperial expenditure” – or, things outside of Scotland which are nonetheless partly funded by Scotland if they’re deemed to be good for the whole UK… like HS2, Trident, Boris Island, the House of Lords, and others. As working parents, perhaps the Midgleys would be better considering what staying in the UK would mean for their family.


THIS IS A LIE. It’s a particularly preposterous one because of the use of Ireland as an example – mostly because unlike the UK, Ireland is entirely surrounded by sea. The UK has the Channel Tunnel and access to the European mainland, so of course prices will be higher there. Scotland isn’t an island, so there’s no reason for groceries to be any higher than they are now.


THIS IS A LIE. I can only quote that man from the second Darling/Salmond debate: if we’re Better Together, why are we not better together?


THIS IS A LIE. The Scottish Parliament has full power over NHS, school, police and transport policy, but not NHS, schools, police and transport finances – because Scotland’s finances are largely controlled by Westminster. One cannot have full power over anything if they have no power over something as significant as its budget.


THIS IS A LIE. “The strength, security and stability of the UK” is a cruel joke considering the UK’s current standing in the world, and the possibility of “more decisions” being devolved is vague and meaningless.


THIS IS A LIE. There are serious risks and uncertainties in staying in the union – further austerity, the further erosion of rights, irreversible privatisation, possible future wars, and more besides. To say independence offers more risk and uncertainty than remaining in the UK is outrageous.


THIS IS A LIE. At least they waited until the second-to-last page for an Alex Salmond dig. But to say that independence is synonymous with Alex Salmond is to ignore the long history of the modern independence movement.


THIS IS A LIE. Based on all the evidence in front of us, it is the definition of madness to expect anything less than more of the same from Westminster.


THIS IS A LIE. One of the few truly unambiguous things about the entire debate is that Scotland can keep the pound, Westminster cannot stop us from using the pound, and indeed no other country can stop Scotland from using the pound. The only ambiguity is whether the use of the pound would be official or unofficial – there is no way we can’t “keep” the pound.


THIS IS A LIE. The absolute worst thing you can do to protect Scotland’s schools & hospitals is to let Westminster continue on its path of grotesque tuition fees and privatisation of the NHS.


THIS IS A LIE. As with the pound, pensions are one of the few absolutely sure things we know about independence – namely, that your pensions are as secure in independence as they would be in the UK.

I’m already sick of this. I will not cover any more Better Together material, because frankly, what else could I say? Everything listed is a lie. Some are complex misrepresentations, which use omission and remove information from context to give the opposite impression of the reality. Some are outright fabrications with no bearing on truth. And some are simply, utterly, irrefutably, lies. This is how Westminster does things. When they have no genuine case, they simply resort to lies, deception, fear and tactics. And I’m sick of it.

Just be honest with us. “We want Scotland to stay because Scotland’s balance of trade props up the UK’s economy. We want Scotland to stay because our millionaire friends want a lovely isolated place to shoot grouse and deer. We want Scotland to stay because over half of the UK’s territorial waters belong to Scotland. We want Scotland to stay because we want somewhere to park our nuclear status symbols. The people? If you’re worth taking, then you’ll come down to work in London: the rest of you can eke out an existence in the wilderness. Scotland is what we want – not its people, no, just the resources, the land, the water. The property. The things.” But we’ll never hear that, because they can never tell us exactly how little we mean to them.

Vote Yes, and we have a chance to end the Politics of Deceit. We may never utterly eliminate corruption, and certainly will never eradicate mendacity – but at the very least, we can cleanse them.

No more lies.

*The culprit was indeed an “angry youth” – a young family member was as incensed as I was with the contents of the leaflet that they couldn’t help but grasp it without any care for its condition. In fact it was delivered by our postman –  the fact that Better Together are so starved of grassroots campaigners that they must resort to the post speaks volumes. I greatly apologise to our wonderful postmen, whose jobs I appreciate more than ever before.

11 thoughts on “No More Lies

  1. Bamstick says:

    Last night I completed exactly the same exercise as you did and came up with the same conclusions. The wee pamphlet is not worth the money spent to print it. Maybe this is their attempt at a Wee Blue Book?

  2. alharron says:

    (Edit: this was sent in from a reader who asked me to put it on the blog, so I obliged)

    Taranach, this is great and I love how they always get a TESCO ad and publicity for people who give donations. A large variety of lovely people of Scotland to speak for them? People like us? Except that shopping is already a sore point and I know LIDL and lots of little shops flying are the flag for us in true grasroots style, simply showing their view and supporting their staff and their customers. One prize to share – it’s almost ours – let’s take it!

  3. Katrine Paterson says:

    Decisions decisions! Look at what Westminster has done for the working people of Britain in the last 35 years.

    Started getting Oil from the North Sea. (goody goody! Mega bucks!)
    Our troubles are over! Or should have been.

    Margaret Thatcher took charge,
    In the early 80s She had a ‘war’ with the miners.
    Closed the coal mines then imported coal from Poland and China etc..
    Closed stealworks
    Decimated the shipbuilding industry. The workers decided to work on, so had a ‘lock in.’ Good old Jimmy Ried. What a hero!
    Riots in Bristol (in the eighties) Youth unimployment had begun, still a huge problem today.
    Young people obliged to do 6 months in job training with nothing at the end of it. My niece did at least 4 stints of this for very little pay.

    Installed Managers (people with no understanding of caring for the sick) in place of Matrons in MHS hospitals. Staff cuts followed to pay for the expensive managers. (efficiancy?)
    4.5 MILLION ENDED UP ON THE DOLE! Paid for by oil of course!

    Gulf War begins on August 2, 1990 and ends on February 28, 1991
    All about oil supplies. Of course The Government didn’t admit that.
    The 90s also saw War in Bosnia Herzegovina between 6 April 1992 and 14 December 1995.
    2001 Afghanistan war. Our troups are supposed to leave 2014.
    20O3 The second Gulf war. The government Lied about chemical weapons.
    I could go on.
    Chancelor Brown had dreams of being PM. He had ruled the economy since 1997. Oversaw the feel good years of ‘Prudence.’ No more boom and bust he said. Prudence was in charge!
    But it seems the bankers were anything but prudent! I recall being badgered every time I visited my bank. They wanted me to buy insurance, mortgage protection, a loan perhaps? A will?
    That was the last straw! Their staff were stressed too. Sell, sell, sell!
    I told all of them they should stick to banking.
    So why didn’t Gorden Brown tell them the same?
    Many people fell into this trap, to their cost.
    Greed had set in everywherr in the south east of England where I lived at the time. (have to get back with my ain folk I thought)
    The Bank crash started with the Yorkshire Bank. Then the domino effect took over. The government started pouring our money into these banks, never to be seen again. ‘It’s global,’ they explained.
    It was, but why were the banks allowed to jump on every gravy train going. People were getting in debt up to their ‘oxters.’
    Bankers bonuses were staggering! I’d have locked the buggers up!

    Foodbanks! The bedroom tax! The poorest and the sick and vulnerable paying for the mistakes of the filthy rich!
    Oh I’ve had enough!
    I can’t wait to vote yes Yes YES!
    I’ll be first in the queue at 7am on September 18th. Then I’ll get drunk!

  4. Wilma Watts says:

    Excellent expose. I have shared on Twitter and Facebook. Keep going you write with real passion.
    I don’t know if you have read Steven O’Brien’ s blog, “Open letter to Better Together”. Read and have a laugh. Also his” Malediction upon the Naws”. It is a bit strong but absolutely justifiable. When I was doing my own research, as a confirmed No voter last year, I said to all my friends that I didn’t want the Yes or No to come between us. Now I cannot understand how any person, who lives here ,can be a No voter. And I echo his assertion that it is not Yes who should be defending its position but the No camp. I don’t know about you but I cannot get entrenched No voters here to engage at all. I know you covered this in another blog, maybe my technique is wrong.

    • alharron says:

      I have read Steven’s blog, it’s great. It is interesting how strongly passionate I feel about this issue. I’ve never felt quite so determined about anything in my life, and while I’m still determined not to let this undermine my friendship with my No-voting friends (one of my best friends in the world is one), it’s a divide unlike any other. Very strange.

      I do agree it’s sometimes hard to engage with No voters. We had one come into Yes Inverclyde claiming to be undecided, but whenever we put any piece of information in front of him – not just leaflets, but paper clippings, printouts, government documents, graphs, charts – he shoved them away saying “I don’t care about that, I want you to TELL ME.” Even when he came in another day brandishing The Express, and we put The Herald before him, he shoved it away. “I don’t have to acknowledge your evidence, but you MUST acknowledge mine” seemed to be his model.

      • wwilmawatts says:

        Thank you for confirmation of my feelings about the No mind set. I have it in my own family. My son has moved out of the UK to avoid voting. When he came out of the RAF after 14 years, he was very homesick. He had been in England all that time. He and his then wife moved to Oban. Now another 13 years later he has moved Slovakia. Before he left we had a very strange conversation about homesickness. He said that he had fallen for it once but never again. He sounded so bitter about Scotland. I didn’t push it because we had already had the most awful row about Independence at Christmas when he called me a fundamentalist and we have never discussed the subject again. It broke my heart. I try to make light of it but it is so serious a subject. I am sorry to use this email as an agony aunt type letter. But as they say, ” It’s good to talk.” I always have enjoyed your comments on Wings over Scotland and I am glad to have found your blog. I have been reading it for some time but never clicked the Follow button. I do hope you and your No voting friend have some kind of resolution. We have the same here and Steven’s blog clarified something that I had been feeling, that we Yessers are having to defend our position and that is wrong. The No voters must defend theirs. All the best, Wilma

  5. Martin Sinclair says:

    Reblogged this on My Indyref Take and commented:
    outstanding breakdown of BTs newest lie leaflet

  6. Murray says:

    A few points: how is saying your pension is at risk when you don’t know your currency a lie? How are folk offering subjective OPINIONS liars? How is citing ‘economists’ a lie, but then you go on to cite Business For Scotland (i.e. the SNP) as one of your sources?! This is hypocritical tosh. Can I have my last 5 minute back, please.

    • alharron says:

      A few points: how is saying your pension is at risk when you don’t know your currency a lie?

      Well, Ian Davidson MP is on record as saying Scottish pensions are safe. The DWP have confirmed Scottish pensions are safe.

      As for the pound, even Alisdair Darling says Scotland can use it.

      How are folk offering subjective OPINIONS liars?

      If an opinion is based on false evidence, I’d consider that opinion to be a lie. Please note that I’m not saying the individuals quoted in the article are themselves liars – but Better Together are an official campaigning organisation with full knowledge and access to the facts, and they printed these statements without clarification, or even evidence. That is what I’m referring to by lies.

      How is citing ‘economists’ a lie, but then you go on to cite Business For Scotland (i.e. the SNP) as one of your sources?!

      Saying “economists agree” suggests that there is a general consensus among economists. There is no such consensus, because various economists disagree on the matter in question. Better Together, as an official campaigning organisation, know this well. Therefore, it is a lie.

      I’ve never heard of Business for Scotland’s links to the SNP beyond some members being SNP supporters or members – which doesn’t surprise me, as you’d think the governing party of Scotland would have voters from all walks of life.

      This is hypocritical tosh. Can I have my last 5 minute back, please.

      Sorry you weren’t convinced, Murray.

  7. Hugh Wallace says:

    Reblogged this on Are We Really Better Together? and commented:
    Just be honest with us. “We want Scotland to stay because Scotland’s balance of trade props up the UK’s economy. We want Scotland to stay because our millionaire friends want a lovely isolated place to shoot grouse and deer. We want Scotland to stay because over half of the UK’s territorial waters belong to Scotland. We want Scotland to stay because we want somewhere to park our nuclear status symbols. The people? If you’re worth taking, then you’ll come down to work in London: the rest of you can eke out an existence in the wilderness. Scotland is what we want – not its people, no, just the resources, the land, the water. The property. The things.” But we’ll never hear that, because they can never tell us exactly how little we mean to them.

What're your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.